PDF Literature Review and Focusing the Research - SAGE Publications Inc The capability of firms to absorb new knowledge depends on the shared knowledge base of the academics and the firm employees. The role of relational trust in banksmall firm relationships. 2016; Sandberg et al. It has a strong relationship with causal ambiguity, as it also strongly depends on a shared knowledge base (Cohen and Levinthal 1990). Finally, looking for a higher common good can help to re-unite goals if there seems to be no common ground (Mesny and Mailhot 2007). The most important characteristic of knowledge is its explicitness (Santoro and Bierly 2006). An empirical investigation of the roles of prior knowledge and learning activities in technology transfer. (2013), but we did not find relevant papers in this period. Besides our aim to develop a theoretical perspective to study academic engagement our focus on knowledge transfer adds to previous reviews on academic engagement. However, there are other ways for academics to ensure application of their knowledge these practices focus predominantly on knowledge exchange (Salter and Martin 2001; Alexander and Childe 2013). We locate extant data through the use of contextual positioning as we ascribe to a view that context is inherent to analysis. Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (2004). We also identified the most relevant factors and practices for the mitigation of these differences. They relate to differences in knowledge background between the firm and the academics. 0000051607 00000 n The third section outlines our analysis of the literature resulting from our review. Which shows that tacit knowledge is transferred in four steps; (1) through creating shared experiences (socialization), after which knowledge is (2) externalized, (3) recombined and (4) internalized. Academy of Management Journal, Fear for a lack of common interests is reduced by building social capital, which includes, tie-strength, and collaboration experience with the particular partner (Pinheiro et al. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. It can be wise to start with smaller projects, such as student internships or thesis research, to gain collaboration experience and to learn about the capabilities of a partner. 0000148751 00000 n The extent to which cultural differences affect academic engagement is unclear, even as the role of experience to reduce this barrier. IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management, 2010). Hence, ambiguity is negatively related to knowledge transfer and hard to resolve without on the job training (Van Wijk et al. This can result in more ambiguity and less trust in that the partner will do what is right for you. Systematic Reviews, Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). Mercy College New York. There seems to be a need for future research to improve our understanding of how cultural differences are managed. 2015). In the following part we will discuss the findings from the literature we reviewed. Therefore, relatedness of prior knowledge and technological competence help to understand and integrate new knowledge (Daghfous 2004; Santoro and Bierly 2006) and reduces ambiguity. Trust and communication help to overcome both, cognitive differences and differences in goals. The debate also extends into the wider academic community, where no consensus exists. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Simultaneously, the paper collates technical terms related to FinTech that appear repeatedly in each category and explains them. We started our review with identifying barriers and facilitators of knowledge transfer. Coordination is often effected informally between project managers from both sides (Barnes et al. We only searched within English peer reviewed journal articles. 31(3), 303328. These suggestions are based on open questions we encountered during our analysis and inconsistencies between the results in the papers discussed here. 2014), training (Alexander and Childe 2013; Azevedo Ferreira and Rezende Ramos 2015; Daghfous 2004; Gertner et al. 1087 0 obj <>stream 2011) and is valued higher by industry (Cohen 2002), researchers into universityindustry interactions have ignored these forms of collaborations for a long time. Introduction to the special issue on university entrepreneurship and technology transfer. Therefore, we changed the search strategy to an approach in which we used broad Boolean search strings to identify papers on academic engagement from which we manually selected the ones that discuss research partnerships in relation to knowledge transfer. %PDF-1.6 % Knowledge ambiguity refers to a situation where dissimilarities in knowledge result in inherent and irreducible uncertainty regarding what the underlying knowledge components and sources are precisely, and how they interact (van Wijk et al. Qualitative and quantitative research has both identified factors which influence knowledge transfer, but have not integrated their results. ture This thesaurus page includes all potential synonyms, words with the same meaning and similar terms for the word extant literature. 46(2), 369382. 31(2), 175188. Therefore, it is often recommended to start with small projects, like student projects, and build to more complex collaborations and more fundamental questions from there (Buganza et al. 2014; Wang and Lu 2007). Communication to determine goals and to discuss what information can be published is the most important way to deal with these differences. The U.S. Charter School Landscape: Extant Literature, Gaps in Research, and Implications for the U.S. Educational System. This could be due to incoherence in terminology at all levels; from terminology to indicate the form of engagement to the factors and theoretical frames that are used to discuss knowledge transfer. MoU instead of formal contract, informal reporting), or as Powell et al. This kind of communication improves insight in the partners goals. Publication management includes arrangements regarding what data can be published and allows the industrial partner to authorize publication, this ensure academics do not publish sensitive knowledge (Azevedo Ferreira and Rezende Ramos 2015). 2011; Steinmo 2015; Wang and Lu 2007) and interactional expertise (Canhoto et al. Administrative Science Quarterly, Extant Research - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics This paper aims to undertake a thematic review of academic papers on financial technology (FinTech) to identify three broad categories for the purpose of classifying extant literature. II. Philosophy, This thematic paper divides FinTech into three themes, i.e. 2013b; Steinmo 2015). Inter- and intra-organizational knowledge transfer: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and consequences. Buganza, T., Colombo, G., & Landoni, P. (2014). Yet, we believe this difference taps into a broader debate, on the governance of university knowledge transfer, presented by Geuna and Muscio (2009), who argue that UI collaborations have a more informal irrational management style than is often assumed. STANDS4 LLC, 2023. 0000189372 00000 n Our analysis offers practical advice for the management of academic engagement. (2013). 2007; Thune 2009). 2012). Our framework and the factors found by van Wijk et al. Spirituality in the workplace: a systematic review - Emerald 2014; Pinheiro et al. However, arranging IP too early in the collaboration might negatively influence trust between partners (Canhoto et al. Studies on prior knowledge have asked how prior technological knowledge and management capabilities are related. 2016; Plewa et al. 2023. Wallin, J., Isaksson, O., Larsson, A., & Elfstrm, B. Research Policy, 24(12), 939953. 2013). 0000149127 00000 n Overview of the Literature Review Process and Steps. Why do academics engage with industry? In relation to cognitive differences there seems to be agreement that secondment, employee exchange and hiring graduates are important ways to (bi-directionally) transfer the tacit aspects of knowledge and that Master and PhD students can play a particularly important role in this (Gertner et al. Organization Studies, be extrapolated from extant literature because, as we discuss in Section II, the literature does not agree whether auditors are punished or rewarded for GAAP-related failures. ; However, Wells concludes that the reconstruction of this historical figure from the extant literature . (2009). et al. Reflecting on the challenges of choosing and using a grounded theory approach. Absorptive capacity refers to the ability to recognize, assimilate and apply new external knowledge (Cohen and Levinthal 1990). L0dR'QL')t4V3Le*WM ?ESAPbY{OslJ>=X_^y9|>akE%Xm|Q{7nJYwY?,I4Sv-R~,gt]31)qSEi_\WazUX@8Y[,jlLc_D|,U*2Tz1F2ac?z~]UU=*|V=&t+~j!kw[Hk) The process of doing a research proposal involves critical analysis of the extant literature in order to map out what is already known about the topic and to identify the gaps in knowledge (McGhee, Marland, & Atkinson, 2007; Dunne, 2011). Universitiesindustry collaboration: A literature review. We aim to contribute to the theoretical development in the field of academic engagement and propose that knowledge transfer provides a valuable perspective. This paper can be used by other novice researchers as an example of the decision-making process that led to delaying a pre-study literature review and identifies the resources used to write a research proposal when using a classic grounded theory approach. 2010; Plewa et al. 22(7), 597624. 2011; Hadjimanolis 2006; Wang and Lu 2007). A case study of SMEuniversity research collaboration in the context of a small peripheral country (Cyprus). The next step was to analyse the papers we selected. Little attention has been paid to the practices required to build trust or the effect of trust on knowledge transfer specifically. 2014). 29(4), 567586. We propose that research into academic engagement can build on theory on knowledge transfer to fill this gap. These factors and their definitions (see below) were used to decide which of the papers on academic engagement in our results discussed topics that could be related to knowledge transfer. It is noted that FinTech is in its nascent phase and is undergoing continuous development and implementation through product and process innovation, disruption and transformation. Al-Tabbaa, O., & Ankrah, S. (2016). The paper summarizes lessons that could be of significance for FinTech users, producers, entrepreneurs, investors, policy designers and regulators. 1077 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<22E3C1F6DE70034A8FEE0FAACABEF336><2C1749C03B6AF048B38588F3D32BB5B9>]/Index[1062 26]/Info 1061 0 R/Length 79/Prev 158736/Root 1063 0 R/Size 1088/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly. (2004). financial industry, innovation/technology and law/regulation. "extant literature." Sherwood, A. L., & Covin, J. G. (2008). Firm employees who interact frequently with researchers and follow the debate at academic meetings gain a deeper understanding of the working methods and knowledge produced by the researchers. During the collaboration knowledge is best transferred through rich, meaningful, direct and bilateral interaction, especially when tacit knowledge is involved. Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. 3(4), 285302. This means that we will focus on research partnerships, collaborative research, contract research and consulting while collaborations with limited interaction or that require little or no new research are excluded. The three main grounded theory approaches are classic, Straussian and constructivist, and the seminal texts provide conflicting beliefs surrounding the use of literature. Slider with three articles shown per slide. Achieving effectiveness involves a combination of specific knowledge or expertise vis-a-vis substantive law, institutional process, and other actors in the system. Also, the literature mainly focuses on problems in the implementation phase. Strategic Management Journal, (1996) call it, irrational. Following previous research in the field of UI research (for example Perkmann et al. (2013) and Ankrah and AL-Tabbaa (2015) we used the principles and process of a systematic literature review (Tranfield et al. Collaboration experience with a specific partner and learning how to deal with differences seems the best way to overcome differences in logic and goals. Analytical framework of knowledge transfer success in academic engagement. When there are large differences between organizational cultures, it is more likely that organizations have different research goals and possibly also different knowledge backgrounds. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press. Differences in organizational goals and culture are a frequently mentioned, but not well defined barrier to academic engagement. 2011, Hadjimanolis 2006; Wallin et al. Shared goals are needed to reach a common understanding of the desired output and the interpretation of results (Tsai and Ghoshal 1998). The results from the Boolean search from the three literature databases were combined in Rayyan (Ouzzani et al. They provide a space for deliberation and feedback which increases the comprehension of results (McCabe et al. u Emv4] P[,rFR,qXa@spH?RL4g 2002; Ghauri and Rosendo-Rios 2016; Morandi 2013; Wallin et al. To save this word, you'll need to log in. Resultantly, academic reputation and previous personal ties are important drivers for establishing collaborations (Pinheiro et al. "Context" in healthcare information technology resistance: A systematic Bridging the gap between university and industry: Three mechanisms for innovation efficiency. Method: We searched in: titles, keywords and abstracts using the terms: Universitybusiness, universityindustry academic engagement and research partnership (other terms for university such as Academ* and Higher Education science did not yield additional results), combined with one of the terms collaborat*, cooperation*, partnership*, engage*, relation* research alliance*. While conducting our review we encountered some problems in our search process. 0000015879 00000 n Careers. Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced searchad free! Trust is positively influenced by tie strength and shared goals, and negatively by ambiguity and organizational differences. European Journal of Innovation Management, Although cognitive distance does not diminish the propensity to collaborate, it does limit interaction during the collaboration. In our analysis we identified a number of barriers to successful knowledge transfer in academic engagement. (2010), Cyert and Goodman (1997), Liyanage and Mitchell (1994), Partha and David (1994), Galan-Muros and Plewa (2016) and Ghauri and Rosendo-Rios (2016). This paper continues with a methodological section that describes our review process. HHS Vulnerability Disclosure, Help Sandberg, J., Holmstrm, J., Napier, N., & Levn, P. (2015). Also, there seems to be agreement that secondment, employee exchange and hiring graduates are important ways to transfer the tacit aspects of knowledge in both directions. To which Daghfouss (2004) adds that systematic learning in relation to management skills does not significantly increase learning capabilities. Our search terms were based on previous reviews by Ankrah and AL-Tabbaa (2015) and Perkmann et al. Research Policy, On the other hand, it would be interesting to gain greater insight into what knowledge academics require from firms, to enables them to provide relevant results and manage the knowledge needs of the firm. Bringing together this literature on knowledge transfer enabled us to develop a stylised model that shows how different characteristics of knowledge transfer relate in the context of academic engagement (Fig.
Rulefiss Wireless Earbuds Instructions, Spring Ligament Surgery Recovery Time, Defence Ict Help Desk Dreams, Aztec Google Slides Theme, Articles E